Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Synthetic chinking versus mortar chinking

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Administrator Ellsworth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,296
    Blog Entries
    4

    Synthetic chinking versus mortar chinking

    Can you imagine how much time a person saves using synthetic chinking?

    I'm trying to wrap my head around the theoretical math.

    Mortar chinking:

    Shove in backer rod / insulation.
    Hammer in a 'few' nails.
    Order sand, lime, get a mixer, hawk, trowels, cleaning supplies, spray bottles, sponges, et cetera.
    Mix a a cubic foot or two of mortar and start troweling it on.
    Walk back a few times to refill your bucket and/or hawk (eventually ladders are involved).
    Keep mixing small batches and keep walking / climbing.

    Synthetic chinking:

    Shove in backer rod.
    Rent a chink pump with a 25' hose.
    Buy a bunch of synthetic mortar in buckets and dump'em in the hopper.
    Chink away with the press of a button.
    Keep dumping buckets into the hopper as needed, and keep using the 25' hose to apply.


    Sure there's a cost difference between mortar chinking and $ynthetic. Material and a pump rental.
    Yes, the synthetic can trap more moisture behind it on a seasonal basis, thus can cause rot issues.
    Yes, the synthetic can blister and separate, and generally has a 20 year lifespan.
    Yes, the synthetic is more of a non-natural material with the accompany off-gassing of chemicals.
    Yes, the synthetic can be lit on fire and does emit smoke.

    But, it sure saves a lot of time if you're simply building a new home and want to move in quick.
    Last edited by Ellsworth; 08-12-2024 at 07:42 AM. Reason: No warm up, 5 edits

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •