Ellsworth

Things I Learned About the Law Last Week

Rate this Entry
During two separate incidents last week I noticed something about vehicles that were driving near me that caused me to do some legal research. Just driving by I knew something was (maybe) wrong.

1) On I-5 Northbound in Seattle I saw an tractor trailer combination (semi truck pulling a big trailer). This one was shiny and new and had AMAZON written all over it. I always assume that operators like that (Amazon, Fed-Ex, UPS, et cetera) maintain their fleets a bit better than many smaller companies or solo-operators. And I always figure they are the ones obeying every rule of the road due to GPS monitoring, in-truck monitored camera pointed at the driver, et cetera.

So when I saw the trailer's brake lights go on and simultaneously an amber flasher turn on I was surprised.



I had done a deep dive into rear vehicle lights a while back. Amber turn signals reduce accidents by approx 25%, and are required in the European market. America went with the 3rd brake light which reduced accidents by around 3-5% (these numbers are from memory).

It's about natural human observation / response time to a visual anomaly -- red brake lights and red turn signals blend together in a field of vision.... Yellow turn signals next to red brake lights are a real stand out. I've been slowly adding amber turn signals to all my vehicles and trailers.

During that phase of my amber light education I learned that brake lights must be red. Zero exemptions in Federal Law as far as i could find.

I had also looked up flashing amber safety lights. I rarely see construction vehicles on the road using them (often in construction zones, and rarely just randomly driving on a highway). So I thought 'Hey, if amber turn lights help, I wonder what flashers do?' Which caused me to look up the law. Continuously flashing yellows are not legal. It's ok in a construction zone for work vehicles, it's ok for government vehicles, but not ok for the average person to just throw a yellow flasher on top of their truck and drive around. I had guessed that before my research, and wasn't really interested in such a bright 'look at me statement.' But once you head down the amber light rabbit hole it's hard to stop.

Back to that Amazon truck in Seattle. Imagine my surprise when I saw a amber flasher activate on the trailer along with the brake lights. It surely reduces their accident rate significantly, because a yellow brake light REALLY stands out in a sea of red brake lights.

So dug back into vehicle light research. It seems like there may be some specific Federal exemptions being made (just for a few special truck owning companies?) and that data didn't turn up in my search from a couple years ago. My earlier deep dive (actually reading codes) did not turn it up... but now just a glance on a search engine reveals the data. Yellow brake lights are controversial, some states really don't like it, and it might still be enforced as illegal. Heck if I know what the real legality status is for amber brake lights, it seems that convoluted.

https://www.topmarkfunding.com/fmcsa...ght-exemption/
https://www.arnolditkin.com/blog/tru...ailers-bendin/
https://www.fleetmaintenance.com/equ...leet-equipment


2) I was stopped at an accident scene waiting to make a turn. It was an overcast evening, no rain but the roads were wet.

A motorcycle drove toward me in the oncoming lane. Black motorcycle, all black leathers, black helmet -- no headlight on. I was about as shocked as seeing an amber brake light. So I flashed the rider a few times with my headlights hoping they would get the message. As the bike drove by I noticed it did have two small white lights adjacent to the headlights and those small lights were on, and I reflected upon up how black vehicles are the most prone to be in a vehicle accident because they are the most difficult to see (especially in poor conditions).

So I filed that all away and decided I had some research to do. My truck had about 1k pounds in the bed that day (over the rear axle even), and I was on a road I know well, and I admit I lost traction when I started driving from a dead stop (it was on a hill). I have driven that road one million times, so that should give an idea of how accidents can happen. Heck my tires are new and I sure didn't have a lead foot. It was the same intersection where my elderly mother almost died in a car accident, which made me reflect on how easily accidents happen, and her difficult choice to stop driving.

Anyways, shoving that little embarrassment aside, I did the research into motorcycle headlights when I got home. Sure enough daytime headlights are required in my state. But apparently in some states motorcycles only need to use daytime running lights. Maybe the rider was an out-of-stater. But if they knew statistics like I do, the bike and leathers would have been yellow (lol).

https://www.motorcyclelegalfoundatio...eadlights-laws
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...g/74076937007/

The take away from this blog post?

  • Amber turn lights are awesome and make you tons safer on the road. Amber turn signals = approx 25% reduction in accident rates, blinking amber brake light = 33.7% reduction*
  • America should have adopted amber turn lights (like Europe did) instead of 3rd brake lights.
  • Some companies might be getting a free pass on amber brake lights.
  • If you ride a motorcycle make it a brightly colored on and use your headlight.
  • Sometimes weight does not equal traction.
  • The ability of some corporations to use blinking amber brake lights is a de-facto subsidy that gives them a market advantage, because there is a large reduction in accident claims (corresponding insurance savings). But, without their initiative nothing might change.


And lastly, have a fun and safe summer!

*This could impact self driving car safety statistics, if that market adopts yellow flashing brake lights. And if adopted for all vehicles, then it would have a significant impact on insurance companies and medical costs. I'm all in on amber lights.
Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	amazon-yellow-brakes-lights=sm.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	142.3 KB 
ID:	4753  

Submit "Things I Learned About the Law Last Week" to Facebook Submit "Things I Learned About the Law Last Week" to Twitter Submit "Things I Learned About the Law Last Week" to del.icio.us Submit "Things I Learned About the Law Last Week" to StumbleUpon Submit "Things I Learned About the Law Last Week" to Digg Submit "Things I Learned About the Law Last Week" to Google

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Ellsworth's Avatar
    On a related note, during the same week I achieved an Amazon milestone: 14 parts ordered, 4 were defective out of the box and 4 did not meet the specifications in the product description (making them unusable for my project out of the box).

    14 parts ordered, 8 were bad. Over a 50% 'failure rate' (failure = not usable for the required task as new products out of the box, or parts not usable as the design intended them to be used).

    Before placing my orders I did a ton of research and learned the following:

    • Cam-locks are supposed to all match a manufacturing spec but in reality they might not. Ordering all the cam-locks from one manufacturer increases the chance everything fits (especially on sizes smaller than 1.5")
    • New fuel transfer hoses can have two major issues out of the box, bleeding black rubbery goo into fuel or shedding tiny crumbly rubber pieces into fuel

    The project taught me a lot more than that, but the above two issues are the main 'ordering new stuff from Amazon' lessons.

    I had read all the product reviews. I had used FAKESPOT extensively to compare products before selecting what seemed like the best products. And yet still I had over a 50% failure rate out of the box on what was ordered.

    It has left me contemplating the expense of shipping unusable bricks, across the ocean, across the nation, back and forth. It would be easy to confuse that with a political expression, it's not intended as such. I'm just a consumer that had to work 2x as hard because over half the products didn't work.

    I'm left contemplating Amazon versus Sears. And Amazon now versus Amazon when it first started selling products.

    Try inserting a more than 50% product failure rate into various points of the corporate timelines and image how it would impact the companies. Could Amazon have launched with a 50% + failure rate on shipped products and been successful? Could Sears? Does the frog in a cold pan metaphor/joke help explain the acceptance of shoddy products and high return rates?